|
Scapegoating Chinese Has Long History by Siauw Tiong Djin (reprinted from Green Left Weekly [Australia])
The Dutch ruled Indonesia for more than 350 years by using the
strategy of "divide and rule". Whenever confronted
with the people's wrath, they used the Chinese settlers as a shield
to deflect the anger, and cleverly created the impression that
they gave special protection and privileges to the Chinese.
But what was the reality?
Chinese settlers came to south-east Asia in the 7th century.
When the Europeans arrived in the 15th century, the Chinese were
the principal agents of trade between the Indonesian islands,
China, India and other countries, and within Indonesia between
rural areas and towns.
At that time, the Chinese and the indigenous people, the Pribumi,
co-existed with no signs of racial tension. Immigration of Chinese
continued until the outbreak of World War II.
Although in Java many Chinese were in business, many more were
making a living as carpenters, cabinet-makers, vendors, restaurant
owners and workers. Outside Java, particularly in Sumatra and
Kalimantan (Borneo), the majority of the Chinese were labourers
in Dutch mines and plantations.
The East Indies Company, and later the colonial government, made
use of the trade network already established by the Chinese and,
initially, the two groups were in close collaboration.
Prominent Chinese businessmen became community leaders, and the
Dutch recognised their importance by naming them "lieutenant",
"captain" or "major of the Chinese". As the
economy grew, however, and colonial rule was consolidated, the
role and influence of the Chinese was circumscribed in policy.
The "pass and zoning system" was established in 1863,
and vestiges of it survived until the 1930s. Chinese were confined
to designated precincts, giving rise to the characteristic Chinese
quarters (Pecinans) of towns and cities in Java, reminiscent of
Jewish ghettoes in Europe.
Travel for the Chinese was also restricted by the requirement
of travel passes, which were normally valid only between the place
of residence and the place of work.
It was only after repeated protests by the Chinese that the restrictions
were gradually lifted, beginning at the turn of this century.
The colonial subjects were grouped along ethnic lines and distinctions
between Pribumi and Chinese were made in the courts and in schooling.
The overall result of these policies was that the Chinese in the
Netherlands East Indies became marginalised and demonised. The
colonial exploitation and poverty of the people, and all sorts
of other ills in society were blamed on the Chinese.
Anti-Chinese sentiments turned into violence during the revolution
of 1945-1949. There are reports of Dutch authorities organising
criminals from jails under their control to commit atrocities
in Chinese districts in Indonesian-held territories. When Dutch
forces "came to the rescue", quelling the marauding
mobs, the impression was created that the Chinese were protected
by the Dutch and in alliance with them.
The perception that the Chinese were disloyal led to many violent
outbursts of anger, causing many Chinese to flee Indonesian-held
territories into Dutch-occupied areas. The Dutch used this as
"evidence" that Indonesians could not maintain law and
order and should not be granted independence.
Because of the loss of life, property and dignity, many Chinese
opted to support the Dutch or look towards China.
With Indonesia's independence in 1949-1950, however, Chinese political
leaders were generally successful in convincing their compatriots
that they had no choice but to consider Indonesia their country.
Between 1950-59, rather than to rid Indonesia of its colonial
economy by nationalising Dutch companies, the political elite
considered it politically more expedient to take over businesses
that for a long period were in Chinese hands.
The PP-10 regulation, enacted in 1959, banned Chinese who did
not hold Indonesian citizenship from living in and owning business
in small towns and villages. More than 100,000 people were displaced
and left Indonesia for China in 1959 and 1960.
At the same time, there were moves afoot to minimise the number
of Chinese eligible for citizenship, raising the fears that the
restrictive business regulations would deprive many people of
their livelihoods.
The proposed changes -- which would have defined as aliens those
people granted Indonesian citizenship under the 1946 legislation
and under the agreement made with the Dutch in 1949 -- were eventually
defeated by concerted opposition from Chinese members of parliament.
During the years of "Guided Democracy" (1959-1965),
many of the discriminatory laws and regulations were revoked.
The position of the Chinese in Indonesia benefited from the close
ties that President Sukarno had with China.
Racial violence still occurred, but the government always quickly
condemned and suppressed it. Significantly, the Provisional People's
Consultative Assembly in 1965 accepted the policy of utilising
domestic, Chinese-owned capital for purposes of national economic
development.
When Suharto came to power towards the end of 1965, he accused
the Chinese Indonesians' of loyalty to Communist China and persecuted
them accordingly.
Chinese schools were ordered to close, and the use of Chinese
languages and writing in public was banned. Chinese people adopted
Indonesian names en masse under official urging. Even
as discriminatory regulations were issued thick and fast, anti-Chinese
riots continued.
Like the Dutch before him, Suharto employed the strategy of "divide
and rule" with great effect. While for certain groups the
impression was created that the Chinese were Suharto's allies,
for others the Chinese were responsible for the general poverty
amongst the populace.
Government officials and military officers frequently vilified
them and the racial riots were usually incited by provocateurs,
agents of Suharto, who urged the crowds to loot, rape, even kill,
and to destroy Chinese property.
In the closing stages of Suharto's government, orchestrated anti-Chinese
hostilities were evident.
On May 13 and 14, truckloads of men wearing crew cuts and military
boots appeared in predominantly Chinese neighbourhoods and incited
the crowds to attack houses and shops, to loot and to torch them.
These men were also responsible for the atrocities perpetrated
against hundreds of Chinese women, who were gang-raped and in
some cases murdered.
These acts of terror were clearly organised. As thousands of victims
cried for help, the authorities simply stood by and were slow
to take action to restore order. Only after lives were lost and
there had been extensive destruction of property were troops deployed.
Arrests were made, but they were limited to flunkeys unfortunate
enough to be caught. Those who pulled the strings behind the scenes
are still at large.
During those two days of rioting in Jakarta, 40 large shopping
complexes, 4100 shops and offices, and 1200 residences were destroyed.
An estimated 2000 people lost their lives and thousands were traumatised
by the horrific experiences inflicted on them.
_____________
Siauw Tiong Djin is convenor of the Melbourne-based Committee
Against Racism in Indonesia. He is currently researching aspects
of the history of the Chinese in Indonesia at Monash University.
This articled is abridged from his paper on the current reform
struggle in Indonesia and the issue of minorities. -Green
Left Weekly
_____________
home
|
subscribe
|
talk
|
help-about
|
back issues
|
resources
|