Letters

John Lennon and the IRA

Around the anniversary of John Lennon's murder there was a minor polemic about John's attitude towards the Irish struggle. Both "Marxists" and "tough" militarists denied a story that John and Yoko had supported the IRA. The denial was based on "logical" grounds, i.e. the pacifism, the life style....

Anyhow the polemic was between an anonymous figure and several well-known radicals. To cut to the chase; the unknown "Lennonist" turned out to be Joe Cahill, he who from 1984 until retirement at age 82 in 1998, had served as "P. O' Neill." [sender/signer of IRA official bulletins --ed. note] Didn't the old man post on the web site an autographed photo of John and Yoko picketing #10 Downing Street, while carrying placards calling for victory to the IRA?

Then Joe posted the story of the secret meetings with John & Yoko, of the million pounds in cash and the request that it be used to buy arms. It seems that a few months before the murder John came to Joe Cahill with an offer of a world tour to raise funds for the IRA. The tour was blocked by various figures on the Army Committee; figures that Joe regarded with utter contempt for their political and cultural sectarianism. A few months later and Lennon was gunned down by the archetypal lone, mad etc. Odd to say, but the old fella suspects the fine hand of MI5 or the CIA behind the murder. Just his opinion.....

Slan,
Roger Collins
["Slan" is a Irish sign-off like "Regards."-ed. note]

____________

"Before Night Falls" review

Editor's note: Apologies for a number of font errors in last issue's "Sexual Politics and the Cuban Revolution." Sadly, SeeingRed suffers from DWS [Disappearing Webmaster Syndrone] so correcting or posting new material sometimes just isn't possible. If you or someone you know can help, please let me know directly at <seckardt@aol.com>.<

Meanwhile, the Jon Hillson's two pieces last issue --"Sexual Politics and the Cuban Revolution" (reprinted correctly in this issue) and "'Before Night Falls' - Old Trash in New Buckets"-- have achieved wide national and international welcome and circulation. People have copied the shorter movie review and handed it out at movie theaters. Websites like New York Transfer Newshave reproduced either or both versions, numerous listservs have circulated them, and many dozens of xeroxed copies are being handed around. Three people even cooperated to translate the longer (25-page) article into Spanish (also in this issue).

Credit the continuing advance/deepening of the Cuban Revolution, Washington's ever-growing isolation on its hostile policy, and the weakening of Stalinism's pernicious impact on politics around the world.

Nothing like the right ideas at the right time.

But --as many people wrote in to say-- special thanks to Jon and his weeks spent researching and writing. Here's three, just for flavor:

Felicidades por este excelente y necesario articulo. Un abrazo cubano desde Londres,

Pedro

 

Magnificent review, magnificent work! I was very much impressed by your review of "Before Night Falls." It seems that the mainstream press exhausted the usefulness of Armando Valladares, "The Wheelchair Poet" who promptly scrambled down the stairways of a Parisian Airport once he was "set free." Now the media have turned to the dead soul of Arenas. When it comes to Cuba, US media know no limits.

Michael

Great article. I had known from the beginning that homophobia wasn't a product of the Cuban Revolution, but instead a product of Roman Catholic dogmatism and other factors. It came a suprise to me of the life history of the writer [Reinaldo Arenas], although I still plan on watching the movie to check it out for myself.

Check out my streaming video on Che when you have the chance,

http://ThePeoplesRevolution.tripod.com/Revstrtpg.html

Hasta la Victoria Siempre,

Capablanca

We did get one negative response. Keep in mind that to encourage discussion, privacy's protected in our Letters section --no email addresses given (unless asked to) and no last names. This applies whether your comments are positive or negative --in fact critical letters are especially welcome, and will be treated respectfully, no matter how deep the differences.

But hate mail's another story. If, like the writer below, you want to say "EAT SHIT" you don't get to do it anonymously. Sound fair?

<Subject: Dear Communist Homophobes>

Dear Arenasphobes:

The fact that you are trying to bad mouth the Arenas movie Before Night Falls is proof of how bad you "progressives" want to stop other people from viewing it. What are you afraid of - it's just a movie? Its just another form of censorship on your part. We have seen it all before. Or are you jiggy with some forms of expression and not others? I bet you find "Before Night Falls" offensive but you 100% support the sister at the Brooklyn Museum and "Yo mamas last supper"? You got to be fair, you got to be equal, you got to be EGALITARIAN comrades!

By you being critical of this movie you are all against gay and lesbian people. You are bigots and support the very same violence carried out at Gay people in the movie. How very progressive of you!

You try to be so open minded in your "progressive" ways but in the end your Stalinist censorship tactics come out of the closet! (Pardon the pun).

You are just afraid other progressive gays, lesbians, and transgender people will see this movie done by a liberal North Eastern urban Jewish artist who went out of his way to finally EXPOSE the truth about Cuba and it's repression on homosexuals and in the end ALL CUBANS. You are afraid the lies you have created will be broken. Well guess what? They are about to.

You can show your propaganda Castroite GAY CUBA movie (and you have all the right to - this ain't Cuba afterall where there is censorship)till you are lavender in the face - but in the end the truth is well known - Fidel represses the human rights of gays as well as all Cubans.

I mean Amnesty International (not a right wing org) even says so.

You are fully aware it will go a long ways at dispelling the myth you have created for yourselves outside Cuba.

You will fail miserably for as Lincoln used to say:

You can fool all the People some of the time and you can fool some of the People all the time, but what you can't do is to fool all the People all the time.

Hey Stalinist fascists, the day they allow Before Night Falls to be shown in all movie houses in Cuba without government interference is the day I say, CUBA IS TRULY EGALITARIAN! Until that day a dictatorship is a dictatorship is a dictatorship.

HASTA LA LOCURA SIEMPRE COME MIERDAS!

Michelle Russo

 

Ms. Russo offers only one piece of information to support her vitriolic charges, the fact that Amnesty International (to its eternal shame) has backed certain claims of democratic rights violations in Cuba.

It's true that Amnesty --just like BFN director Schnable-- isn't straight-up rightwing. But the phony liberal/conservative distinction covers over a division more meaningful: the class line, in other words whether you're for or against the capitalist class and its worldwide system of savage inequality. As politics today polarize around this line, people are discovering that all kinds of supposed "progressives" are on a different side than the world's 'unenlightened' workers, farmers, and minorities.

There's a movie that's a perfect example of this phenomenon: "Before Night Falls."

By the way, Russo lies when she claims the review tries to stop people from seeing the movie. Neither Jon nor SeeingRed have ever suggested people not watch it. (Nor have I heard of a single case of anyone anywhere calling for a boycott.) In fact a lot of people, after reading Jon's review, decided it's something they'd better go see.

No, if you want to find people against free exchange of ideas and free travel (let alone free medical care and education), you'll have to look on the other side of the class line.

 

Dear, Idiot

You suck, I am only 11 and I am smarter than you.

What kind of person would be commy. Commy should all hang you jack@$%# ! I think china is the fagidiest country ont his planet. You have no idea about life. I think that all reds should hang. We should of nuked china and cuba while we had the chance. Thanks to Bill (hook) Clinton the second most idiotic person than you weakened us. I am a proud constitutionlist. That go by the US constitution.

From,

Harrison

Given the age of the writer, his last name gets withheld. And don't feel too bad that's there are 11 yearolds with views like this, they're not born with them. Count on the source --capitalism-- driving tens of millions to opposite ideas as its relentless drive for profits puts economic/environmental survival further and further out of reach.

 

 

Iraq, nuclear weapons, and Jonathan Schell

Jonathan Schell misrepresents the record of UN weapon's inspections in Iraq in the Sunday, March 18, 2001 Philadelphia Inquirer Commentary "An end to the arms race on Earth?"

He writes: "Nuclear proliferation continues. The post-Cold-War world is awash in nuclear technology. In 1990, Saddam Hussein was estimated to be within a year of succeeding in building nuclear weapons. His defeat in the Gulf War spoiled his timetable, but he has now rid himself of the UN inspectors sent to Iraq after the war, and may have restarted his program."

In a world "awash in nuclear technology" the author chooses as his first example Iraq, a nation that has never possessed nuclear weapons!

Schell's remarks reflect a familiarity with US State Department positions while at the same time display an irresponsible ignorance of events in Iraq. Saddam Hussein did not "rid himself of the UN arms inspectors." The UN weapons inspection teams left Iraq in 1998 discredited in an international scandal. The Iraqi characterization of UN weapons inspection teams as spies proved to be accurate. Secretary General of the UN Kofi Annan publicly condemned these UN teams for providing military information to Iraq's military opponent, the US. In this context Richard Butler, the head of the UN inspections, ordered the inspectors out of Iraq. President Clinton then dropped 2,000 cruise missile bombs on Iraq for not cooperating with UN weapons inspections.

The former UNSCOM inspector Scott Ritter describes the inspections:

"...this intrusion into Iraqi sovereignty was misused by the United States and Great Britain for intelligence collection purposes which had little to do with supporting UNSCOM's disarmament objectives, and everything to do with pursuing an agenda to destabilize, and ultimately topple, the regime of Saddam Hussein. Operation Desert Fox, the 72-hour bombing campaign launched in December 1998 ostensibly to degrade Iraq's weapons production capabilities, underscores this reality: less than 10% of the targets struck dealt with weapons of mass destruction, the vast majority instead focusing on political, military and security facilities which had been identified by UNSCOM inspections." (April 7, 2001)

In summary, UN weapons inspections were used to coordinate US bombing attacks on Iraq. Iraq's refusal to allow the return of weapons inspectors is simply a legitimate act of self-defense.

Jonathan Schell, the Peace and Disarmament fellow at the liberal Nation magazine, contributes to the war hysteria in the US when he speculates about non-existent nuclear weapons, the future plans of Saddam Hussein and misrepresents the aggression against Iraq. Many people in the US are horrified at President Bush's February 16 incendiary cluster bombing of Baghdad, but there still exists a broad bipartisan acceptance of the war on Iraq. Jonathan Schell a respectable pacifist can be counted among those who support the war.

Bob Allen

Campaign to End the Sanctions

<EndTheSanctions@cs.com>

 

Update on Leonard Peltier

Friends,

We have put together an update on the case of Leonard Peltier which outlines the legal status of the case, remaining avenues, and a plan of action. We will send it out to the list in sections. Feel free to forward the information for outreach purposes - reformat it for print - or send our office a self addressed envelope and we will send you a formatted packet which you can copy and distribute. Thank you.

In Solidarity,

Leonard Peltier Defense Committee

23 April 2001

<LPDC@idir.net>

 

Case Status

Leonard Peltier has never received a fair trial and his most obvious avenues for legal redress have been exhausted. The jury that convicted him never knew about any of the abuses that were involved in the FBI's investigative process, nor were they able to consider the barred and concealed evidence which firmly supported Peltier's innocence. Despite this, all of Leonard Peltier's attempts to obtain a new trial have been unsuccessful. As of yet, the courts have utterly failed to bring him justice. New evidence must be acquired to make a new trial possible.

Post Trial Developments

* In 1978 Leonard Peltier appealed his conviction. He argued that Judge Benson's rulings, which banned key defense witnesses, barred critical evidence, and unduly allowed the prosecution to enter inflammatory evidence, made a fair trial impossible. Peltier also argued that the United States had no jurisdiction to try him because his extradition from Canada was obtained illegally and should have been reversed. A new trial was denied.

* In the early 1980's a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit forced the release of over 12,000 FBI documents, which contained substantial new evidence supporting Peltier's innocence. Most important, the defense obtained a previously concealed ballistic report, which thoroughly refuted the government's most critical piece of evidence, thus absolving Peltier as the shooter. Based on this and other new evidence, Peltier filed a motion for a new trial and in 1985, the Eighth Circuit Court held oral arguments. During these arguments U.S. Prosecutor Lynn Crooks admitted, "we can't prove who shot those agents." In its decision, the court found that the jury might have acquitted Peltier had the FBI not improperly withheld evidence "casting a strong doubt on the government's case." Yet, a retrial was denied based on an over strict reading of a legal standard for a new trial. Judge Heaney, who authored the decision, has since voiced his firm support for Peltier's release through Executive Clemency.

* In 1990 Peltier filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, arguing that the prosecutor's admission during the 1985 oral arguments clearly exonerated him from the crime he was convicted of. But, the government argued that Peltier was equally culpable for the deaths of the agents, whether he shot them at close range or merely participated in the long range shoot-out. They argued that even if he did not shoot the agents, he was still equally guilty as an aider and abettor. However, who he aided and abetted, how he aided and abetted them, and why, has never been established. Furthermore, Peltier's co-defendants were found innocent on grounds of self-defense for the very same involvement for which Peltier is now imprisoned. Plus, over 40 people participated in the shoot-out according to FBI documents, and Peltier alone, is being held responsible. Despite all of this, the courts again denied a new trial.

* In November of 1993 Leonard Peltier filed a petition for Executive Clemency with then President Clinton. An intensive campaign was launched and supported by Native and human rights organizations, members of Congress, the international community, church groups, labor organizations, luminaries, and celebrities. The Peltier issue escalated into a national concern. The FBI, fearful that Peltier would be released, responded by launching a major campaign of disinformation in both the media and among key government officials. As it became clear that President Clinton intended to make a decision on the case as the end of his term in office neared, the FBI went even further and marched in front of the White House to discourage a positive decision. Despite strong arguments that fully justified a grant of clemency, and despite overwhelming support for clemency from many of Clinton 's friends and allies, Clinton failed to act on the request, buckling under FBI pressure.

Remaining Avenues

Parole

Leonard Peltier is not only eligible for parole, but he is long overdue. In 1994 the U.S. Parole Commission examined Peltier's conduct since his imprisonment, factored this with the severity rate of the crime he was convicted of, and determined that he became eligible for release after 188 months (almost 16 years) of imprisonment under Parole Commission guidelines. Since then, Leonard Peltier has undergone one full parole hearing and three interim parole hearings(1) and has been arbitrarily denied parole after each. His next full hearing is scheduled for 2008. According to law, the Parole Commission is required to justify their reasons for denying a prisoner parole beyond what the guidelines set forth. However, the commission has failed to articulate any rational reasoning for doing so and in fact have demonstrated blatant racial discrimination and animus toward Peltier(2). Despite Peltier's admirable human rights work from behind bars, his mentoring of other prisoners, his good conduct, his serious health risks, and his twenty-five years of imprisonment, the Parole Commission has indicated that they will not consider releasing him as long as he maintains his innocence.

In 1999 Peltier's attorneys filed a petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with the district court in Topeka Kansas, arguing that the Parole Commission has denied Peltier parole arbitrarily, capriciously, and in violation of the United States Constitution. The judge has yet to make a ruling. He could either demand the parole commission release Peltier, instruct the parole commission to accelerate Peltier's next full Parole Hearing date, or dismiss or deny the petition altogether.

Parole Obstacles

* The FBI has been granted "victims rights" by the Parole Commission, which means, because two FBI agents were killed, the FBI as an entity, can intervene in Peltier's parole process. The Parole Commission gives very heavy weight to a victim's position, and of course, even heavier weight to the FBI's wishes. The FBI voices strong opposition to Peltier's parole release every time he is considered.

* In 1984 the Comprehensive Crime Control Act was passed. This act set forth the total abolition of the U.S. Parole Commission, and made effective mandatory minimum sentencing on a federal level. The act did not apply to anyone convicted before its passing. These prisoners are referred to as "old law" prisoners and they remain eligible for parole.

Congress scheduled the Parole Commission's abolishment date for 1992 and mandated it to immediately give all old law prisoners their probative release dates. However, as the commission's final abolishment date neared, they requested a five year extension, due to the heavy case load of old law prisoners still in the system. The extension was granted and the abolishment date was postponed until 1997. As 1997 neared, the commission requested another extension, and the abolishment date was again postponed, this time until 2002. However, very few old law prisoners have been given their probative release dates and most have been denied parole beyond what the guidelines mandate, without justification. It appears that the Parole Commission, motivated by self interest, is denying prisoners parole in order to stay in power. The Parole Commission is currently scheduled to be abolished next year, however thousands of old law prisoners remain in the system. Quite obviously the Parole Commission intends to seek yet another postponement and meanwhile, thousands of old law prisoners are being illegally detained, including Leonard Peltier.

Freedom of Information Act - 6000 FBI Documents

Because the courts only allow an issue to be litigated once, new evidence is needed in order to obtain a retrial for Leonard Peltier. That new evidence likely exists in the over 6,000 documents still being withheld by the FBI.

In the early 1980's, pursuant to a Freedom of Information Act Lawsuit, over 12,000 of these documents were released. But, the FBI continued to withhold over 6,000 documents in their entirety and another 6,000 in part, for reasons of "national security" and "ongoing" police investigations.

The first batch of documents proved that:

1. Peltier did not fire the fatal shots. 2. The FBI intentionally withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense. 3. The FBI agents had undeniably followed a red pickup (not a red and white van) onto the ranch, a vehicle that could not be tied to Peltier. 4. The FBI had framed Peltier: Several other suspects with more evidence against them existed, but were never indicted. One document stated the FBI' s intention to "develop evidence to lock Peltier into the case." 5. The prosecution colluded with the FBI and the Canadian prosecutor to present falsified evidence to the Canadian court and obtain Peltier's extradition. 6. Without justification, the FBI forewarned the trial judge, who later warned the jury, of possible AIM violence, thus creating a prejudicial atmosphere in the courtroom. 7. The FBI had Peltier under surveillance for his AIM involvement years prior to his arrest. 8. The FBI had been preparing for a paramilitary operation on the Pine Ridge reservation weeks before the shoot out and had been closely surveillancing AIM activities there. 9. The FBI considered AIM a threat to the United States and covertly sought to destroy the movement.

We can only imagine what might be contained in the rest of the documents. Because 25 years have passed since the shoot-out, some of the legal justifications available to the FBI for withholding documents are no longer officially valid. Therefore, new Freedom of Information Act requests have been filed and we can expect another lawsuit to take place in the future. Meanwhile, we can also pressure the United States Congress to pass an act to declassify the documents.

Congressional Investigations/Hearings

Certainly, the Pine Ridge "reign of terror" of the 1970's is one of the most disturbing civil rights chapters in U.S. history. Yet, no government agency has ever recognized the grave human rights abuses which occurred, nor taken steps to prevent such abuses from reoccurring. This, combined with the continued imprisonment of Leonard Peltier, sends a disturbing message - collective dissent could bring devastating repercussions to those living on isolated reservations. Still today, many who lived through that era fear violent backlash for voicing even the slightest of criticism toward the U.S. government.

We want to pressure Congress to hold investigational hearings into the human rights abuses that occurred on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, including:

* The violence perpetrated by the Tribal Chairman and the GOON Squads upon the traditional people of Pine Ridge * The relationship between the FBI and the GOON squads * The lack of oversight from the United States government * The FBI's neutralization tactics against the American Indian Movement * The framing of Leonard Peltier * The FBI's ongoing efforts to cover up and continue Peltier's unjust imprisonment

The House Judiciary Committee of Congress has the power to initiate such investigations. However, they are currently split in their positions about Peltier - most of the Republicans sympathize with the FBI and most of the Democrats with Peltier. Unfortunately, the Republicans are the current majority and the Democrats cannot initiate an investigation without their approval. This means obtaining hearings will be difficult unless the balance changes - which it very well may after the next election.

But, this does not stop us from working toward the investigations. We can use this time to do necessary outreach to our representatives, building up substantial pressure and awareness so that when the shift occurs we will be ready. The more support we can garner from House and Senate members - both inside and outside the Judiciary Committee - the better.

Plan Of Action:

* LPDC Research and Restructure Phase - Post Clemency

The Leonard Peltier Defense Committee is currently in a research and restructuring phase. We are working to build the LPDC into a more forceful and effective organization by expanding our staff, organizers, lobbyists, legal team, resources and eventually, our entire network. We want to make sure a good foundation is in place before we launch the next major campaign.

We are also researching less obvious legal avenues, lobbying strategies, and international options (OAS and United Nations). Therefore, we currently have no set dates for national events, but we do encourage supporters to organize locally and regionally to help us keep the momentum going.

* Outreach and Education

If we are able to enter Leonard Peltier's case back into the courts, it will be extremely important for there to be extensive public awareness and sympathy surrounding the case. Now is an opportune time to build such support through public outreach and education. Here are some things you can do:

- Set up literature tables at events/public places - Organize teach-ins - Host speaking engagements with LPDC spokespeople - Plan video showings - Leafleting - Write letters to the editor - Encourage community radio stations to highlight the case - Gather names, addresses, phone numbers and e-mail addresses from Peltier supporters for our data base and list serve - Hold book readings featuring My Life Is My Sun Dance by Peltier

* Congress

Write, and encourage others to write, the two senators of your state and the representative of your district. Urge them to support an act to declassify the 6000 documents, congressional investigations, and the oversight of the U.S. Parole Commission. Enclosed is a sample letter. Please forward copies of any responses you receive to our office.

* Peltier Awareness Month - June 2001

June is a significant month in both the history of the Peltier case and the history of the Lakota People. On June 26, 1975 the tragic shoot-out which, led to Leonard Peltier's unjust imprisonment occurred. Two years later, on June 1, 1977 Peltier was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences. Almost a century prior to the shoot-out, on June 23, 1876, the Lakota People defeated Custer at the Battle of Little Big Horn. Over a decade later, on June 23, 1876, the Ghost Dance was inaugurated on the Pine Ridge Reservation.

We want to dedicate this June to raising awareness about Leonard Peltier and related issues in our own communities. The activities will begin on Peltier 's sentencing date - June 1st and conclude on June 26, the 26th anniversary of the shoot-out:

June 1-8 Congressional Outreach Week (letter drives, visits to district offices, and phone bank planning)

June 9-15 Letters to the Editor Week (send letters to your local news papers)

June 16-26 Community Outreach Week (organize video showings, literature tables, book readings, and leafleting).

Initiate Peltier Awareness Month in your community. Contact us for more resources and organizing tips. Please let us know at the earliest possible date if you are organizing activities so that we can publicize them through our network, and let people in your area know what you are doing, should they ask. Also, your ideas and plans may help inspire others to take action.

* Fund Raising

Whether we receive a hearing on the pending habeas corpus (parole commission), new evidence from the Freedom of Information Act, or try other legal routes, we will need attorneys who can dedicate the time necessary to take full advantage of any remaining avenue. Although our lawyers are more than willing to volunteer their services, they can only do so much for free, and still be able to support their families. Therefore, we need to raise money for their legal expenses and time.

Also, the Leonard Peltier Defense Committee relies on the contributions of supporters to stay afloat. The LPDC is the center of communication between Leonard Peltier, his attorneys, his support network, the media, his family, etc. We coordinate the legal, grass roots, and political campaigns to gain his freedom.

You can donate to the LPDC by sending a check or a money order to PO Box 583 Lawrence, KS 66044. Donations over $250 are tax deductible upon request - such checks should be made out to "Global Exchange/LPDC." Checks under $250 can be made out to "LPDC."

Thank you for your support!

 

Footnotes:

1. The Parole Commission is required to hold an Interim Parole Hearing every two years to determine whether there are any new circumstances which justify a change in the original parole hearing decision. During interim hearings, prisoners can also raise allegations of any errors made by the commission in their original determination.

2. In 1998 a parole examiner stated, "I realize that you are what is often called a Native American who is also called an Indian ... but the facts of this case are that someone killed these individuals, that they are dead, that they were in fact murdered, and someone from that Nation, someone present on that date, that appears to have been a part of your nation committed these crimes.... [U]nfortunately you, Mr. Peltier, are the one and only person who was convicted in this matter ....."

______________________

Leonard Peltier Defense Committee

P.O. Box 583 Lawrence, KS 66044

Tel: 785-842-5774

E-mail: lpdc@idir.net

Web: http://www.freepeltier.org

_____________

For a 12-issue subscription to the print edition of The Militant, send US$10 to 14 Charles Lane, New York, NY 10014. Visit the website for information on international rates.

_____________

    home     |     subscribe     |     talk     |     help-about     |     back issues     |     resources